Published: June, 2009; Vol. 6, Num. 1
According to Miser, her brother had just relit a furnace that had gone out. “Shawn and two co-workers decided to stick around to make sure everything was okay. Shawn’s back was towards the furnace. Some say he got up and started walking to the door (after a first blast), but a second blast occurred. He did not die instantly. He lied [sic] on the floor while aluminum dust burned through his skin and muscle tissue. It burnt his internal organs and took his eyesight. He was still conscious and asking for help. The company never bothered to call the family to let us know he was injured or [that] there had been an explosion. We got a call from a friend. Shawn had no body hair or physical markings that would identify him. The doctors said his internal organs were burned [beyond] repair and that was apparent by the black sludge they were pumping out of his body. [Our family took] him off life support and we watched my brother die before our very eyes. We watched him take his last breath. His last words were, ‘I am in a world of hurt.’”
Sign up to receive our monthly notice of LIFELINES ONLINE’s headlines with links to each article.
Giving Workplace Fatalities a Face
“Giving workplace fatalities a face” is the goal of the year-old website United Support & Memorial For Workplace Fatalities (USMWF). The effort has struck a chord.
The site is sponsored by a non-profit of the same name that was founded by Tammy Miser in 2004, a year after her brother’s death in an aluminum dust explosion at an automobile manufacturing plant in Indiana.

Miser, second from left, holds a photo of a lost worker at the Workers’ Memorial Day rally at the U.S. Department of Labor.
The tragedy could have been prevented. “[Combustible aluminum dust fires] had happened at the plant before,” Miser recounts, “and the workers were told not to call the fire department because they were worried about OSHA. The company had let the fires burn out (in the past). The fire extinguishers the company had were not rated to handle those fires and some were not fully filled. The company eventually shut down.”
From her own experience, Miser learned about both the impotency and callousness of OSHA as it functioned during the Bush Administration. As a relative of a victim, she had no standing to contribute to OSHA’s investigative work, nor to speak to its enforcement decisions. Yet, victims had often spoken to their relatives about conditions at the workplace as well as the outlook and response of management to identified hazards. Moreover, the input of family members could inform authorities – as is now done at sentencing in criminal trials – as to the full impact of company negligence.
“Not surprisingly,” says the new website, “families too often find little support from government officials when they inquire into how the workplace incident occurred. In spite of their loss and overwhelming frustration with the investigative system, family members are banding together to advocate for safer and healthier work environments. These family members are committed to calling attention to occupational dangers not only to honor their loved ones, but also to prevent other families from experiencing the pain and confusion associated with workplace injury, illness and death.”
In response to USMWF’s advocacy, the Protecting America's Workers Act of 2009, introduced last month by Representative George Miller (D – CA), would establish several new rights for family members:
- The right to meet with OSHA officials before a decision to issue a citation or take no action is made
- The right to receive a timely copy of any citation and report related to the incident
- The right to be informed if the employer contests a citation
- The right to an explanation of rights to participate in proceedings related to the appeal of a citation
- The right to appear and make a statement prior to any agency decision to withdraw or modify a citation
Miser gives a lot of credit for her successful advocacy to Jordan Barab who supported her after her brother’s death and was recently appointed to his new position as Deputy Assistant Secretary and currently serves as OSHA’s acting director. “He pushed me. I hate politics, but he pushed me to get involved. He's been so supportive of the families and he got the ball rolling. Now, at OSHA, there seems to be more of a focus on people. Families are becoming more vocal and are bringing these important issues back to light. I knew I had to do (60 Minutes) and that I couldn’t say no. Now these (offending) companies are scared of us. They’re petrified.”
The USMWF operates on a $160,000 grant from the Public Works Foundation. Raising more money to expand advocacy is an important objective.
Yet, the power of the organization’s advocacy is its personal dimension. The website offers support to family members and provides a place for them to post personal tributes to their lost ones. As Brenda Rea writes on the site,“This website has helped me deal with the loss of my husband. Brian was killed Jan 30th at Sony DADC in Terre Haute, Indiana. He was only 32. The children and I are having a rough time accepting, but I'm finding support. Thank you.”
[Steve Clark]
Sign up to receive our monthly notice of LIFELINES ONLINE’s headlines with links to each article.
- July 2010
- June 2010
- May 2010
- April 2010
- March 2010
- February 2010
- January 2010
- December 2009
- November 2009
- October 2009
- September 2009
- August 2009
- July 2009
- June 2009
- PSA Test No Panacea
- Lyme Disease Spreads West and South
- Secretary Solis Stresses Safety in Stimulus Spending
- Working after Dark
- Feds Sharply Boost Tobacco Tax
- Giving Workplace Fatalities a Face
- NIOSH/NCHA Call for Safe-in-Sound Nominations
- May 2009
- April 2009
- March 2009
- February 2009
- January 2009
- December 2008
- November 2008
- October 2008
- September 2008
- August 2008
- July 2008
- June 2008
- May 2008
- April 2008
- March 2008
- February 2008
- January 2008
- December 2007
- November 2007
- October 2007
- September 2007
- August 2007
- July 2007
- June 2007
- May 2007
- April 2007
- March 2007
- February 2007
- January 2007
- December 2006
- November 2006
- October 2006
- September 2006
- August 2006
- July 2006
- June 2006
- May 2006
- April 2006
- March 2006
- February 2006
- January 2006
- December 2005
- November 2005
- October 2005
- September 2005
- August 2005
- July 2005
- June 2005
- May 2005
- April 2005
- March 2005
- February 2005
- January 2005
- December 2004
- November 2004
- October 2004
- September 2004
- August 2004
- July 2004
- June 2004
- Fall 2007; Vol. 9 No. 3
- Summer 2007; Vol. 9 No. 2
- Spring 2007; Vol. 9 No. 1
- Winter II 2006; Vol. 8 No. 4
- Fall 2006; Vol. 8 No. 3
- Spring 2006; Vol. 8 No. 2
- Winter 2006; Vol. 8 No. 1
- Fall 2005; Vol. 7 No. 3
- Summer 2005; Vol. 7 No. 2
- Spring 2005; Vol. 7 No. 1
- Fall 2004; Vol. 6 No. 4
- Summer 2004; Vol. 6 No. 3
- Spring 2004; Vol. 6 No. 2
- Winter 2004; Vol. 6 No. 1
- Fall 2003; Vol. 5, No. 3
- Summer 2003; Vol. 5 No. 2
- Winter 2003; Vol. 5 No. 1
- Fall 2002; Vol. 4 No. 1