Fatality Study Offers Proof:
Union Trenches Safer than Non-Union;
OSHA Trenching Standard Saves Lives
A recently published, ten-year statistical analysis* of fatalities in trench work provides impressive evidence that union members work far more safely than non-union workers.
Between 1985 and 1995, 522 workers were killed in trench-related mishaps. Of these, 60 died working for union firms while 462 died in non-union employment The actual fatality rates (non-union companies employed about four times more workers than union firms) were 5.71 per million employees for union firms and 11.80 per million for non-union.
The data were gathered by researchers whose main focus was on the impact of a new OSHA trenching regulation that became effective in January, 1990. OSHA regulatory efforts are often attacked as ineffective, and researchers hoped to shed light on this subject by investigating fatalities in the five-year periods before and after adoption of the new standard.
The adoption of the new standard resulted in a 50 percent reduction in trench-related fatalities in union and non-union companies, alike. In the five years before the new standard, the fatality rate was 13.5 per million workers per year, but that dropped to 6.8 per million per year for the five years after adoption. The decline was consistent across all construction companies, regardless of size. In contrast, during the same period, the decline in all other causes of workplace fatalities was only 27 percent.
The researchers concluded, "This study provides evidence that a targeted inspection program along with revision of a previously ambiguous consensus standard is effective in reducing fatal workplace injury."
Because they were investigating the impact of OSHA standards on fatalities, the researchers drew no conclusions from the divergence in fatalities at union and non-union firms.
However, Scott Schneider, the Director of the Occupational Safety and Health Division at the LHSFNA, focused on this point as he reviewed the report. "LIUNA members and contractors should take heart from this new study. It shows that the emphasis we have placed on safety training of members and the work of our Fund has paid off. Union jobs are safer, and that provides a competitive edge for our contractors through lower comp costs and less lost productivity. Also, this study shows that OSHA standards are not the enemy. Instead, they provide a level playing field for safety conscious contractors and help save lives."
_______________
* Suruda A, Whitaker B, Bloswick D, Philips P, Sesek R, Impact of the OSHA Trench and Evacuation Standard on Fatal Injury in the Construction Industry, Journal of Occupational and Environmental Medicine, 2002; 44:902-905.
- October 2010
- September 2010
- August 2010
- July 2010
- June 2010
- May 2010
- April 2010
- March 2010
- February 2010
- January 2010
- December 2009
- November 2009
- October 2009
- September 2009
- August 2009
- July 2009
- June 2009
- May 2009
- April 2009
- March 2009
- February 2009
- January 2009
- December 2008
- November 2008
- October 2008
- September 2008
- August 2008
- July 2008
- June 2008
- May 2008
- April 2008
- March 2008
- February 2008
- January 2008
- December 2007
- November 2007
- October 2007
- September 2007
- August 2007
- July 2007
- June 2007
- May 2007
- April 2007
- March 2007
- February 2007
- January 2007
- December 2006
- November 2006
- October 2006
- September 2006
- August 2006
- July 2006
- June 2006
- May 2006
- April 2006
- March 2006
- February 2006
- January 2006
- December 2005
- November 2005
- October 2005
- September 2005
- August 2005
- July 2005
- June 2005
- May 2005
- April 2005
- March 2005
- February 2005
- January 2005
- December 2004
- November 2004
- October 2004
- September 2004
- August 2004
- July 2004
- June 2004
- Fall 2007; Vol. 9 No. 3
- Summer 2007; Vol. 9 No. 2
- Spring 2007; Vol. 9 No. 1
- Winter II 2006; Vol. 8 No. 4
- Fall 2006; Vol. 8 No. 3
- Spring 2006; Vol. 8 No. 2
- Winter 2006; Vol. 8 No. 1
- Fall 2005; Vol. 7 No. 3
- Summer 2005; Vol. 7 No. 2
- Spring 2005; Vol. 7 No. 1
- Fall 2004; Vol. 6 No. 4
- Summer 2004; Vol. 6 No. 3
- Spring 2004; Vol. 6 No. 2
- Winter 2004; Vol. 6 No. 1
- Fall 2003; Vol. 5, No. 3
- Summer 2003; Vol. 5 No. 2
- Winter 2003; Vol. 5 No. 1
- Message from the Co-Chairmen (Winter, 2003)
- A Message for H&W Fund Admnistrators
- WC: How It Works
- HIPPA Compliance Deadlines Looming; LHSFNA Offers Solutions
- Laborers Join Pace-Setting Effort to Quit Tobacco
- NJ Funds Merger Saves Money, Improves Service
- WC: ADR, Better Way to Address WC
- WC: Discount Programs Offer Some Relief
- WC: Fraud in the System
- Canadian Local 506 Solves Record-Keeping Problem
- Flagger Workstation to Cut Injuries, Comp Premiums
- 2002 Work Zone Safety Award Goes to NELHSF
- WC: Ergonomics and Workers' Comp
- Union Trenches Safer than Non-Union
- Personnel Changes at LHSFNA
- Hearing Conservation Standard Considered by OSHA
- Fall 2002; Vol. 4 No. 1