- Message from the Co-Chairmen (Spring 2012):
- HazCom Rule Adapts to World Standard
- Managing the Drugs that Are Part of Our Lives
- With Prescription Meds, Follow Doctor’s Orders
- Expired Drug Dilemma: Take or Toss?
- Drug Companies Face Scrutiny over Deals with Docs
- Win a Free TV!
- Baseball Sidelines Smokeless Tobacco
- Carteles del LHSFNA: ¡Ahora disponible en español!
- Obesity is a Night Shift Hazard
- Unintended Consequences of Binge Drinking
- Barred on Cigarette Packs, Graphic Ads Run on TV
- New Evidence Faults Nicotine Replacement Therapy
- Workers’ Memorial Day: Mother Jones’ Quest Never Ends
- Tick Alert
Barred on Cigarette Packs, Graphic Ads to Run on TV
When gasping-for-breath smokers say cigarettes aren’t worth it, it’s a lot harder to ignore. That’s the thought behind the U.S. government’s first paid anti-tobacco campaign.
In a series of ads running in newspapers and on billboards, TV, radio and social networking sites, clearly ill smokers implore people not to pick up the cigarette habit and suggest tips for quitting. The campaign was unveiled just days after U.S. Surgeon General Regina Benjamin reported tobacco use among teens to be a “pediatric epidemic.”
Coincidentally, the ads started running soon after a federal court ruling blocked a soon-to-be-implemented Food and Drug Administration (FDA) requirement that cigarette packs carry graphic images of dead bodies, rotting teeth and cancerous lungs (see Will Shocking Images Discourage Smoking? LIFELINES ONLINE, February 2011). U.S. District Court Judge Richard Leon sided with the tobacco companies, saying the required displays and hazard warnings violate the companies' free speech.
Educating the public to tobacco’s dangers “might be compelling,” Leon wrote, “[but] an interest in simply advocating that the public not purchase a legal product is not.” He agreed with the companies that the images were not realistic, educational portrayals of smoking’s hazards and that the requirement is nothing but an emotional ploy to convince people not to buy their products. Tobacco companies “share a responsibility to provide tobacco consumers with accurate information about the various health risks associated with smoking,” said Martin L. Holton lll, executive vice president and general counsel for tobacco giant R.J. Reynolds, “[but] the goal of informing the public about the risks of tobacco can and should be accomplished consistent with the U.S. Constitution.”
The images may still be headed for cigarette pack display. The Department of Justice has appealed the ruling.
[Janet Lubman Rathner]